Will Man With 70 IQ Be Executed in Georgia on July 15?
The following is an article in The Epoch Times, featuring comments from GCDD Executive Director Eric Jacobson on the changes needed in regards to Georgia's death penalty policies and Warren Hill's looming execution.
The Epoch Times, 7/11/13, Click here to read online.
Will Man With 70 IQ Be Executed in Georgia on July 15? - Even Texas would not execute Warren Hill, says advocate
The Epoch Times
By Mary Silver
ATLANTA—Unless the Supreme Court intervenes, murderer Warren Lee Hill, who has an IQ of 70, is set to die on Monday, July 15. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to stay his execution, and said in a July 9 letter that his case was closed. The Supreme Court has not said anything about the case.
Hill came within minutes of death on February 19. He had already received a sedative before his execution was postponed.
The case is not clear-cut, even though Hill was convicted of two murders. The case is confusing to people who know the law and who advocate for people with intellectual disabilities, according to Eric Jacobson, executive director of Georgia's Council on Developmental Disabilities.
No one doubts that Hill has an intellectual disability, said Jacobson. His Elberton, Ga. teachers testified that he functioned far below his peers, and judges in Georgia who reviewed his case agreed that he is "mentally retarded."
Georgia was the first state to prohibit capital punishment for intellectually disabled people, in 1988. But it is the only state in the U.S. that requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt–the only reason Hill could be put to death, according to Jacobson. Georgia has the strictest standard of proof in the nation. For all other states the standard is the preponderance of the evidence.
Jacobson says it is vital for Georgia to enact new legislation to "protect our most vulnerable citizens."
Rita Young, director of public policy at All About Developmental Disabilities, said if Hill were in Texas, which executes more people per capita than any other state, he would not be facing execution. "The pending execution of Warren Hill is an unintended consequence of a glitch in the law," Young said.
She and other advocates want to change the law. She thinks the reason Georgia has such a strict burden of proof is that it was the first state to pass such a law, long before the Supreme Court ruled that executing the mentally retarded is unconstitutional, in 2002.
Stacey Ramirez, the director of Individual and Family Supports at the Center for Leadership in Disability, Georgia State University, said she wanted to comment on the evolution of language. While mentally retarded is still the legal term, "we are moving away from mental retardation, which is being viewed as harmful speech."
An IQ around 70 identifies a person as having an intellectual disability, which translates to lacking some language skills, conceptual skills, or ability to manage daily life, time, money or responsibility, according to Ramirez. Also, some intellectually disabled people have gifts in one area but big deficits in another.
Hill was able to work and to join the military, according to the Georgia attorney general's office. His family regarded him as a leader and as a breadwinner, and his siblings said he "had been their father figure" when the first shooting occurred.
Georgia Attorney General Sam Olens wrote that Hill was sentenced to death in 1991 for murdering another inmate, Joseph Handspike, in 1990. Both were serving life sentences, Hill for shooting his girlfriend to death in 1986.
The State of Georgia found that Hill was faking retardation. Expert witnesses have since said they were wrong.
At the time of his sentencing, the sentence of life without the possibility of parole was not an option.
Hill is scheduled to die at 7 pm at the state prison in Jackson, Ga.
Anthony Romero, executive director of the ACLU, said in a statement that "Killing Mr. Hill would be both unconstitutional and unconscionable."
The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities wrote the Supreme Court on Hill's behalf. They wrote:
"The three government witnesses have acknowledged that their earlier diagnostic conclusions were wrong because of their misunderstanding about the attributes of people with mental retardation and because of subsequent advances in the scientific understanding about intellectual disability."
Jacobson, Ramirez, and Young plan to travel to the state prison on July 15 to keep a vigil for Hill. "We appreciate the prayers and wishes of people around the country," said Jacobson.
